5 million annually to comply with the law. The increases in spending (resulting in less spending in marketing and administration) for many energy companies will be in "security, grid reliability, and wholesale market operations" (Gartner, 2004).
The cost of providing the Securities and Exchange Commission with "two declarations" regarding internal financial controls certainly is significant; and those dollars take away revenue from other departments of utility companies, unless, a utility expects to just absorb additional costs. PriceWaterhouseCoopers' (www.pwc.com p. 4) "Sustainable From the Start" document points to a company's duty under SOX to one, "state its responsibility for creating and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting"; and two, issue an independent report as to whether the auditor agrees with management's conclusion (www.pwc.com p. 9) or not. Moreover, PWC asserts that for some companies SOX has "tipped the emphasis the wrong way and forced companies to get stuck in process as the expense of productivity and profit"; indeed, the cost of paying auditors and consultants to do the work required by SOX certainly is draining revenue from some departments -- and those drained departments could well be administration and marketing.
Bryan Cote, writing in the Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Journal, suggests that companies could lesson the financial impact of SOX audits -- and hence, not have to cut back in departments the utilities rely on for sustained growth such as marketing...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now